Оценка свойств современных хирургических шовных материалов и оптимизация их применения в абдоминальной хирургии (экспериментально-клиническое исследование)
Диссертация
Выражаю благодарность за консультации и помощь в работе доктору физико-математических наук, профессору, директору Центра Экспериментальной механики при ПНИПУ Вильдеману Валерию Эрвиновичу, кандидату физико-математических наук, старшему научному сотруднику Центра экспериментальной механики при ПНИПУ Словикову Станиславу Васильевичу, доктору медицинских наук, заведующему кафедрой медицины катастроф… Читать ещё >
Содержание
- Список сокращений
- Глава 1. ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
- Глава 2. Материалы и методы исследования
- 2. 1. Методика исследования механических свойств хирургического шовного материала
- 2. 2. Методика изучения свойств атравматических игл
- 2. 3. Биомеханическое моделирование напряжения апоневроза передней брюшной стенки при узловом и непрерывном способах ушивания
- 2. 4. Экспериментальное исследование непрерывного и прерывного швов передней брюшной стенки на лабораторных животных
- 2. 5. Клинический этап исследования
- 2. 6. Методы статистической обработки
- Глава 3. Результаты исследований свойств современных хирургических шовных материалов с антибактериальным покрытием и атравматических игл
- 3. 1. Результаты анализа механических свойств хирургических нитей in vitro
- 3. 2. Механические свойства атравматических хирургических игл
- Глава 4. Биомеханическое моделирование передней брюшной стенки
- Глава 5. Сравнительная характеристика исследуемых шовных материалов и способов ушивания передней брюшной стенки
- Глава 6. Результаты хирургического лечения больных с использованием современного шовного материала и усовершенствованных способов наложения анастомозов и ушивания передней брюшной стенки
Список литературы
- Абдоминальная хирургическая инфекция: национальные хирургические рекомендации / B.C. Савельев и др. М.: Компания Боргес, 2011. — URL: http://sia-r.ru/assets/files/IAI%20metodichka-new.pdf (дата обращения: 18.08.2012).
- Абдуллаев Э.Г., Бабышин В. В. Применение однорядного шва в абдоминальной хирургии // Актуальные вопросы хирургии, травматологии и ортопедии: сб. науч. тр. Владимир, 1999. — С. 13−16.
- Абуховский A.A. Основы теории и практики кишечного шва / ред. A.B. Шотта, A.A. Запорожца. Минск, 1994.
- Аракелян А.Г., Пак С.А., Тетера С. А. Современные шовные материалы, или как врачу оперирующей специальности сделать оптимальный выбор шовного материала. Харьков, 2004.
- Бобровская Е.А., Липатов В. А. Проблема шовного материала в сосудистой хирургии. Курск: Изд-во Курского гос. мед. ун-та, 2003.
- Бонцевич Д.Н. Хирургический шовный материал. М.: Интеграция, 2005. — С. 118.
- Буянов В.М., Егиев В. Н., Удотов O.A. Хирургический шов. М.: Ди-митрэйд График Груп, 2000. — С. 93.
- Голуб A.B. Новые возможности профилактики инфекций области хирургического вмешательства // Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2011. — Т. 13, № 1. — С. 1−11.
- Горский В.А., Агапов М. А. Укрепление кишечного шва в абдоминальной хирургии // Медицина. 2011. — Т. 2, № 9.
- ГОСТ 25 981–83. Иглы хирургические. Общие технические условия.- М.: Изд-во стандартов, 1984.
- ГОСТ 26 641–85. Иглы атравматические. Общие технические требования и методы испытаний. М.: Изд-во стандартов, 1986.
- ГОСТ 6611.2−73. Нити текстильные. Методы определения разрывной нагрузки и удлинения при разрыве. М.: Изд-во стандартов, 1997.
- ГОСТ 9013–59. Металлы. Метод измерения твердости по Роквеллу. -М.: Изд-во стандартов, 2001.
- ГОСТ Р53 005−2008. Материалы хирургические шовные. Общие технические требования. Метод испытаний. М.: Стандартинформ, 2009.
- Гостищев В.К., Евсеев М. А. Нить плюс игла. Шовный материал в общехирургической практике: руководство для врачей. М.: АМА-Пресс, 2012. — 188 с.
- Егиев В.Н. Волшебный мир сшивающих аппаратов. М.: Центр, 1995.
- Егиев В.Н. Онорядный непрерывный шов анастомозов в абдоминальной хирургии. М.: Медпрактика, 2002. — С. 100.
- Земляной А.Г., Глушков Н. И., Левшова Н. В. Морфологическая оценка однорядного и двухрядного швов на ободочной кишке // Вестик хирургии. 1992. — Т. 12, № 11. — Р. 332−326.
- Кан Д. В. Руководство по акушерской и гинекологической урологии.- М.: Медицина, 1986.
- Кузнецова Н.Л., Мальцев С. А., Турунцев М. В. Аппаратный способ закрытия гнойных ран // Хирургия. 2007. — Т. 8. — С. 349−356.
- Кузьмина Н.Л., Бибер Б. Л., Абакумова Г. Л. Химические и натуральные нити для хирургических шовных материалов. Обзорная информация. -М.: Изд-во НИИТЭхим, 1988.- С. 47−48.
- Новые возможности профилактики послеоперационных осложнений в абдоминальной хирургии / В. К. Гостищев, М. Д. Дибиров, Н. Н. Хачатрян, М. А. Евсеев, В. В. Омельяновский // Хирургия. 2011. — Т. 5, № 56. — С. 56−60.
- Однорядный непрерывный шов в абдоминальной хирургии у больных пожилого и старческого возраста / П. Я. Сандаков, В. А. Самарцев, В. Н. Наумов, А. В. Тепликов // Пермский медицинский журнал. 1999. — № 3. -С. 39−43.
- Попова Н.А. Использование компрессионных круговых анастомозов при операциях на кишечнике у собак: автореф. дис.. канд. вет. наук. М., 2005.
- Пучков К.В., Гаусман Б. Я., Швальб А. П. Выбор шовного материала в оперативной гинекологии. Сравнительная оценка: биосин, полисорб, викрил, кетгут // Вестник Российской ассоциации акушеров-гинекологов. -1997. -№ 1. С. 83−86.
- Реброва О.Ю. Статистический анализ медицинских данных. Применение пакета прикладных программ STATISTIC А. М.: МедиаСфера, 2002. -312 с.
- Скороходов Л.Я. Краткий очерк истории русской медицины. М.: Вузовская книга, 2010. — С. 430.
- Современные возможности профилактики послеоперационных осложнений в абдоминальной хирургии / Н. Н. Хачатрян, М. О. Чупалов, В. В. Омельяновский, Г. И. Гасанова, А. А. Юанов, Б. И. Радивилов // Хирург. 2011. — Т. 3. — С. 10−14.
- Сравнительная оценка реакции тканей на синтетические шовные материалы, применяемые в абдоминальной хирургии / К. В. Пучков, Д. В. Селиверстов, Б. Я. Гаусман, А. П. Швальб // Вестник Российской ассоциации акушеров-гинекологов. 1996. — № 1. — С. 30−34.
- Столяров Е.А., Грачёв Б. Д. Модифицированный шов при оперативном лечении срединных вентральных грыж // Хирургия. 1996. — № 6. — С. 49−52.
- Тепликов А.В. Однорядный непрерывный шов биосином в хирургии толстой кишки (экспериментальное исследование): автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. Пермь, 1999. — С. 19.
- Тинтиналли Дж.Э., Кроум Р. Л., Руиз Э. Неотложная медицинская помощь: пер. с англ. М.: Медицина, 2001. — С. 258.
- Шадрин В.В., Тепликов А. В. Манипуляционные свойства хирургических нитей // Российский журнал биомеханики. 2001. — Т. 5, № 3. — С. 41−50.
- Шкодкин С.В. Сравнительная оценка эффективности однорядного непрерывно-узлового шва в хирургии полых органов (экспериментально-клиническое исследование): автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. Курск, 2004.
- A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas / A. Bhangu, L. Fletcher, S. Kingdon et al. // World Journal of Surgery. 2012. — Vol. 36, № 5. — P. 973.
- A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds / J.C. Goligher, T.T. Irvm, D. Johnston et al. // Br. J. Surg. 1975. -Vol. 62, № 10. — P. 823−829.
- A framework for structured modeling of skeletal muscle / R.R. Lemos, M. Epstein, W. Herzog, B. Wyvill // Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin.- 2004. Vol. 7, № 6. — P. 305−317.
- A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion / T. Horiuchi, H. Tanishima, K. Tamagawa et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2010.- Vol. 11, № 6. P. 501−503.
- Abdominal wall closure by incisional hernia and herniation after laparostoma / H.-J. Mischinger, P. Kornprat, G. Werkgartner et al. // Chirurg. -2010. Vol. 81, № 3. — P. 201−210.
- Abdominal wall component release is a sensible choice for patients requiring complicated closure of abdominal defects / Z. Kanaan, N. Hicks, C. Weller et al. // Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011. — Vol. 396, № 8. — P. 12 631 270.
- Abdominal wall components separation method for closure of complicated abdominal hernias / D. Pantelis, A. Jafari, T.O. Vilz et al. // Chirurg. 2011. — Vol. 83, № 6. — P. 555−560.
- Alexander J.W., Rahn R., Goodman H.R. Prevention of surgical site infections by an infusion of topical antibiotics in morbidly obese patients // Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009. — Vol. 10, № 1. — P. 53−57.
- Ananthakrishnan N., Rao R.S., Shivam S. Bacterial adherence to cotton and silk sutures // Natl. Med. J. India. 1992. — Vol. 5, № 5. — P. 217−218.
- Antibacterial corrected. coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection / C. Justinger, M.R. Moussavian, C. Schlueter [et al.] // Surgery. 2009.- Vol. 145, № 3. P. 330−334.
- Antibacterial activity of tnclosan chitosan coated graft on hernia graft infection model / A. Cakmak, Y. Cirpanh, E. Bilensoy et al. // Int. J. Pharm. -2009.-Vol. 381, № 2.-P. 214−219.
- Antibacterial-coated sutures reduce wound infection in head and neck cancer reconstruction? / S.Y. Chen, T.M. Chen, N.T. Dai et al. // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011. — Vol. 37, № 4. — P. 300−304.
- Antibiotic coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection / C. Justinger, M.R. Moussavian, C. Schlueter et al. // Surgery. 2009. — Vol. 145, № 3. — P. 330−334.
- Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery / V.P. Ho, PS. Barie, S.L. Stein et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2011. — Vol. 12, № 4. — P. 255−260.
- Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic tnclosan / D. Leaper, O. Assadian, N.-O. Hubner et al. // Int. Wound J. 2011. — Vol. 8, № 6. — P. 556−566.
- Approaches to the abdominal cavity and closure of the abdominal wall / Y. Dittmar, F. Rauchfuss, M. Ardelt, U. Settmacher // Chirurg. 2011. — Vol. 82, № 12. — P. 1067−1074.
- Assadian O., Below H., Kramer A. The effect of tnclosan-coated sutures in wound healing and tnclosan degradation in the environment // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2009. — Vol. 62, № 2. — P. 264−265.
- Azizi E., Halenda G.M., Roberts T.J. Mechanical properties of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis m wild turkeys // Integr. Comp. Biol 2009 — Vol. 49, № 1. — P. 51−58.
- Azizi E., Roberts T.J. Biaxial strain and variable stiffness in aponeuroses // J. Physiol. 2009. — Vol. 587, pt. 17. — P. 4309−4318.
- Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? / C.E. Edmiston, G.R. Seabrook, M.P. Goheen et al. // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006. — Vol. 203, № 4. — P. 481−489.
- Bacterial adherence to suture materials / B D. Masini, D.J. Stinner, S.M. Waterman, J. C Wenke // J. Surg. Educ. 2011. — Vol. 68, № 2. — P. 101−104.
- Bagchi A.K. Susruta: a man of history and science // Int. Surg. 1968. -Vol. 50, № 5. — P. 403−407.
- Barbolt T.A. Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2002. — Vol. 3, suppl. 1. — P. S45-S53.
- Beyond core measures: identifying modifiable risk factors for prevention of surgical site infection after elective total abdominal hysterectomy / H. Young, R. Bliss, J.C. Carey, C.S. Price // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2011. — Vol. 12, № 6. — C. 491−496.
- Bhutani T., Jacob S.E. Triclosan: a potential allergen in suture-line allergic contact dermatitis // Dermatol. Surg. 2009. — Vol. 35, № 5. — P. 888−889.
- Biodegradation of absorbable sutures in body fluids and pH buffers / S. Freudenberg, S. Rewerk, M. Kaess et al. // Eur. Surg. Res. 2004. — Vol. 36, № 6. — P. 376−385.
- Biomechanical differences resulting from the combination of suture materials and repair techniques / N. Yamagami, R. Mori, T. Yotsumoto et al. // J. Orthop. Sci. 2006. — Vol. 11, № 6. — P. 614−619.
- Biomechanics of the front abdominal wall as a potential factor leading to recurrence with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair / M. Smietacski, K. Bury, A. Tomaszewska et al. // Surg. Endosc. 2011. — Vol. 26, № 5. — P. 1461−1467.
- Bjurck M., D’Amours S.K., Hamilton A.E.R. Closure of the open abdomen 11 Am Surg. 2011. — Vol. 77, suppl. 1. — P. S58-S61.
- Bremer F., Gellnch N.-C., Stiesch M. In vitro studies of the mechanical load capability of resorbable monofilament suture materials // Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2009. — Vol. 119, № 9. — P 876−880.
- Bruns T.B., Worthington J.M. Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond // Am. Fam. Physician. 2000. — Vol. 61, № 5. -P. 1383−1388
- Carlson M A., Condon R.E. Polyglyconate (Maxon) versus nylon suture in midline abdominal incision closure: a prospective randomized trial // Am Surg. 1995 — Vol. 61, № П.-P 980−983.
- Carlson M.A., Ludwig K.A., Condon R.E. Ventral hernia and other complications of 1,000 midline incisions // South Med. J. 1995. — Vol. 88, № 4.-P. 450−453.
- Ceydeli A., Rucmski J., Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure, an evidence-based review of the literature // Curr Surg. 2005. — Vol. 62, № 2. — P. 220−225
- Characteristics of hospitals and infection control professionals participating in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System 1999 / C. Richards, T.G. Emori, J. Edwards, S. Fridkm et al. // Am. J Infect. Control- 2001. Vol. 29. — P. 400−403.
- Chronic surgical site infection due to suture-associated polymicrobial biofilm / S. Kathju, L. Nistico, L Hall-Stoodley et al. // Surg. Infect (Larchmt). 2009. Vol. 10, № 5. — P. 457−461.
- Chu C. C, Williams D F. Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion A possible link to wound infection // Am J. Surg. 1984. — Vol 147, № 2. — P 197−204
- Chung E., McPherson N., Grant A. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria // J. Surg. Educ. -2009. Vol. 66, № 4. — P. 208−211.
- Cleveland R.D., Zitsch R.P. 3rd, Laws H.L. Incisional closure in morbidly obese patients // American Surgeon. 1989. — № 55. — P. 61−63.
- Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy / P.N. Larsen, K. Nielsen, A. Schultz et al. // Acta. Chir. Scand.- 1989. Vol. 155, № 9. — P. 461−464.
- Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique / J. Rucinski, M. Margolis, G. Panagopoulos, L. Wise // Am. Surg. 2001. — Vol. 67.
- Comparison of different operation techniques and suture materials in pyloric exclusion, in an animal model / G. Sakman, F. Kaya, C.K. Parsak et al. // Surg. Today. 2008. — Vol. 38, № 9. — P. 826−832.
- Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures / J.-C. Kim, Y.-K. Lee, B.-S. Lim et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007. -Vol. 18, № 12. — P. 2363−2369.
- Comparison of two computer algorithms to identify surgical site infections / M. Apte, T. Landers, Y. Furuya et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt).- 2011. Vol. 12, № 6. — P. 459−464.
- Cost-effectiveness of Dermabond versus sutures for lacerated wound closure: a randomised controlled trial / E.M. Wong, T.H. Rainer, Y.C. Ng et al. // Hong Kong Med. J. 2011. — Vol. 17, suppl. 6. — P. 4−8.
- Creep Behavior of Commonly Used Suture Materials in Abdominal Wall Surgery / E. Nout, J.F. Lange, N.E. Salu et al. // Journal of Surgical Research -2007. Vol. 138, № 1. — P. 51−55.
- Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery is there any consensus? / N.N. Rahbari, P. Knebel, M.K. Diener et al. // BMC Surg. -2009. — Vol. 9. — P. 8.
- De Waele J.J., Leppjjniemi A.K. Temporary abdominal closure techniques // Am. Surg. 2011. — Vol. 77, suppl. 1. — P. S46-S50.
- Degradation behaviors of bioabsorbable P¾HB monofilament suture in vitro and in vivo / X. Chen, X. Yang, J. Pan et al. // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 2010. — Vol. 92, № 2. — P. 447−455.
- Delayed primary closure of the septic open abdomen with a dynamic closure system / F.J. Verdam, D.E.J.G.J. Dolmans, M.J. Loos et al. // World. J. Surg. -2011. Vol. 35, № 10. — P. 2348−2355.
- Donald E. The economic costs of surgical site infection // Surgical Infection. 2002. — Vol. 3. — P. 37−44.
- Douglas D.M. The healing of aponeurotic incisions // Br. J. Surg. -1952.-№ 40.-P. 79−84.
- Doxycycline-coated sutures improve mechanical strength of intestinal anastomoses / B. Pasternak, M. Rehn, L. Andersen et al. // Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2008. — Vol. 23, № 3. — P 271−276.
- Dudley H.A. Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall. A theoretical and experimental analysis // Br. J. Surg. 1970. — Vol. 57, № 9. — P. 664−667.
- Economic and clinical contributions of an antimicrobial barrier dressing: a strategy for the reduction of surgical site infections / D. Leaper, J. Nazir, C. Roberts, R. Searle // J. Med. Econ. 2010. — Vol. 13, № 3. — P. 447−452.
- Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery / K.M.F. Itani, E.H. Jensen, T.S. Finn et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2008. — Vol. 9, № 2. — P. 131−137.
- Effect of pretension and suture needle type on mechanical properties of acellular human dermis patches for rotator cuff repair / S. Sahoo, C.B. Greeson, J.A. McCarron et al. // J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012.
- Efficacy of antimicrobial triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl* Plus) suture for closure of the abdominal wall after colorectal surgery / Z. Rasi>K, D. Schwarz, V.N. Adam et al. // Coll. Antropol. 2011. — Vol. 35, № 2. — P. 439−443.
- Elmussareh M., Simms M.S. A technique for knotting looped polydiaxone during abdominal wound closure // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. -2009.-Vol. 91, № 8.-P. 714.
- Emanuel A., Thomas J. Biaxial strain and variable stiffness in aponeuroses // J. Physiol. 2009. — Vol. 587, № 17. — P. 4309−4318.
- Experimental evaluation, in vitro and in vivo, of the risk of infection related to the use of the most common surgical sutures / R. Giardino, M. Rocca, M. Fini et al. // Minerva Chir. 1992. — Vol. 47, № 23−24. — P. 1799−1805.
- Fibrin-collagen patch (TachoComb) in general surgery. Indications and results / E. Tarcoveanu, C. Lupascu, R. Moldovanu et al. // Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi. 2007. — Vol. Ill, № 2. — P. 396−401.
- Fry D.E. Fifty ways to cause surgical site infections // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). -2011. Vol. 12, № 6. — P. 497−500.
- Gavrilov S.A., Kostenko M.A. Needle holder for round atraumatic needles // Biomed Eng (NY). 1974. — Vol. 7, № 3. p. 178.
- Gilbert P., McBain A., Sreenivasan P. Common therapeutic approaches for the control of oral biofilms: microbiological safety and efficacy // Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2007. — Vol. 13, suppl. 4. — P. 17−24.
- Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection / A.J. Mangram, T.C. Horan, M.L. Pearson et al. // Am. J. Infect. Control. 1999. — Vol. 27, № 2. -P. 97−132.
- Gurevich I. Surgical site infections: simplifying the definitions // Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 1995. — Vol. 16, № 11. — P. 667−668.
- Hancock N.J., Samuel A.W. Use of Dermabond tissue adhesive in hand surgery // J. Wound. Care. 2007. — Vol. 16, № 10. — P. 441−443.
- Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants to prevent surgical site infection / D. Leaper, A.J. McBain, A. Kramer et al. // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2010. — Vol. 92, № 6. — P. 453−458.
- Hochberg J., Meyer K.M., Marion M.D. Suture choice and other methods of skin closure // Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2009. — Vol. 89, № 3. -P. 627−641.
- Hodgson N.C., Malthaner R.A., Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis // Ann. Surg. 2000. -Vol. 231, № 3. — P. 436−442.
- Huer J., Fischer L., Schachtrupp A. Laparotomy closure and incisional hernia prevention what are the surgical requirements? // Zentralbl. Chir. — 2011. -Vol. 136, № 1. — P. 42−49.
- Holmlund D.E. Physical properties of surgical suture materials: Stressstrain relationship, stress-relaxation and irreversible elongation // Ann. Surg. -1976.-Vol. 184, № 2.-P. 189−193.
- Hranjec T., Swenson B.R., Sawyer R.G. Surgical site infection prevention: how we do it // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2010. — Vol. 11, № 3. — P. 289−294.
- Huang L., Zhi L.W. Complete closure by dermal tension reduction suture for skin defects// Am Surg. 2011. T. 77. № 11. C. E254−5.
- Hwang K. The skin irritation of common suture materials// Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. — Vol. 128, № 6. — P. 788e.
- Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures / N.N. Mahmoud, R.S. Turpin, G. Yang, W.B. Saunders // Surg. Infect (Larchmt). 2009. — Vol. 10, № 6. — P. 539−544.
- In vitro and in vivo studies on triclosan/PVM/MA copolymer/NaF combination as an anti-plaque agent / N. Nabi, C. Mukerjee, R. Schmid, A. Gaffar // Am. J. Dent. 1989. — Vol. 2. — P. 197−206.
- In vitro comparison of mechanical and degradation properties of equivalent absorbable suture materials from two different manufacturers / B. de la Puerta, K.J. Parsons, E.R.C. Draper et al. // Vet. Surg. 2011. — Vol. 40, № 2. — P. 223−227.
- In vitro oral biofilm formation on triclosan-coated sutures in the absence and presence of additional antiplaque treatment / S. Venema, F. Abbas, B. van de Belt-Gritter et al. // J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2011. — Vol. 69, № 4. — P. 980−985.
- Incisional closure in morbidly obese patients // Am. Surg. 1989. — Vol. 55, № 1. — P. 61−63.
- Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors // Am. Surg. 2004. — Vol. 70, № 4. — C. 281−286.
- Incisional hernia in patients at risk: can it be prevented? / M.P. Hidalgo, E.H. Ferrero, M.A. Ortiz et al. // Hernia. 2011. — Vol. 15, № 4. — P. 371−375.
- Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh / de Vries Reilingh, S. Tammo, H. van Goor, et al. // J. Surg. Res. 2007. — Vol. 140, № 1. — P. 27−30.
- Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture)
- H.R. Ford, P. Jones, B. Gaines et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2005. — Vol. 6, № 3.-P. 313−321.
- Israelsson L. Choose midline incision for the best access to the abdominal cavity // Lakartidningen. 2005. — Vol. 102, № 14. — P. 1042−1043, 1045.
- Israelsson L. Use continuous suture technique // Lakartidningen. 2003.- Vol. 100, № 8. P. 638.
- Israelsson L.A. Longer suture prevents incisional hernia // Lakartidningen. 1998. — Vol. 95, № 3. — P. 178−179.
- Israelsson L.A. The absorbable knot is smaller and stronger. An easy and safe method for continuous suture technique // Lakartidningen. 1996. -Vol. 93, № 24. — P. 2341−2342.
- Israelsson L.A. The surgeon as a risk factor for complications of midline incisions // Eur. J. Surg. 1998. — Vol. 164, № 5. — P. 353−359.
- Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique // Br. J. Surg.- 1994. Vol. 81, № 11. — P. 1606−1608.
- Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T. Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots // Eur. J. Surg. 1994. — Vol. 160, № 6−7. — P. 323−327.
- Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions // Br. J. Surg. 1993. — Vol. 80, № 10.- P. 1284−1286.
- Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T., Knutsson A. Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions // Eur. J. Surg. 1996. — Vol. 162, № 8.- P. 605−609.
- Israelsson L.A., Wimo A. Cost minimisation analysis of change in closure technique of midline incisions // Eur. J. Surg. 2000. — Vol. 166, № 8. — P. 642−646.
- Jenkins T. P The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach // Br. J. Surg. 1976. — Vol. 63, № 11. — P. 873−876.
- Jin J.-B., Jiang Z.-P., Chen S. Meta-analysis of suture techniques for midline abdominal incisions // Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010. — Vol. 48, № 16. — P. 1256−1261.
- Justan I. Evaluation of suture material characteristics in an in vitro experimental model // Acta. Chir. Plast. 2010. — Vol. 52, № 2−4. — P. 45−48.
- Justinger C., Schilling M.K. Closing the abdominal wall challenges and possible solutions // Zentralbl Chir. — 2011. — Vol. 136, № 6. — P. 564−567.
- Justinger C., Slotta J.E., Schilling M.K. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures // Surgery. 2012. — Vol. 151, № 3. — P. 398−403.
- Kamamoto F., Batista B.N., Tokeshi F. New technique for dynamic closure of the abdominal wall // Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2010. — Vol. 37, № 5. — P. 376−378.
- Kapromed antibacterial suture material / A.V. Volenko, C.S. Germano-vich, O.P. Gurova, R.A. Shvets // Med. Tekh. — 1994. — № 2. — P. 32−34.
- Leaper D.J. Risk factors for and epidemiology of surgical site infections // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2010. — Vol. 11, № 3. — P. 283−287.
- Leaper D.J. Surgical-site infection // Br. J. Surg. 2010. — Vol. 97, № 11. — P. 1601−1602.
- Lee J.T. A new surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guideline // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2000. — Vol. 1, № 2. — P. 127−131.
- Lee J.T. Surgical site infection prevention and unwise process leaning // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2007. — Vol. 8, № 3. — P. 415−419.
- Lemos R.R., Epstein M., Herzog W. Modeling of skeletal muscle: the influence of tendon and aponeuroses compliance on the force-length relationship // Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2008. — Vol. 46, № 1. — P. 23−32.
- Lo I.K.Y., Burkhart S.S., Athanasiou K. Abrasion resistance of two types of nonabsorbable braided suture // Arthroscopy. 2004. — Vol. 20, № 4. -P. 407−413.
- Long term follow up for incisional hernia after severe secondary peritonitis-incidence and risk factors / R. Mohammed, M. Moussavian, J. Schuld et al. // Am. J. Surg. 2010. — Vol. 200, № 2. — P. 229−234.
- Lunstedt B., Knoop M., Thiede A. Review of the physical and surgical technical properties of modern monofilament suture materials // Chirurg. 1986. — T. 57, № 8. -C. 510−513.
- Mahaffey P.J. Surgical site infection. Guidelines or misguidance? // BMJ. 2008. — Vol. 337. — P. a2578.
- Management of open abdomen with an absorbable mesh closure / S. Prichayudh, S. Sriussadaporn, P. Samorn et al. // Surg. Today. 2011. — Vol. 41, № 1. — P. 72−78.
- Maximum forces acting on the abdominal wall: experimental validation of a theoretical modeling in a human cadaver study / M.A. Konerding, M. Bohn, T. Wolloscheck et al. // Med. Eng. Phys. 2011. — Vol. 33, № 6. — P. 789−792.
- McHugh S.M., Hill A.D.K., Humphreys H. Intraoperative technique as a factor in the prevention of surgical site infection // J. Hosp. Infect. 2011. -Vol. 78, № 1. — P. 1−4.
- Mechanical and histological characterization of the abdominal muscle. A previous step to modelling hernia surgery / B. HernSndez, E. Peca, G. Pascual et al. // J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011. — Vol. 4, № 3. — P. 392−404.
- Mechanical comparison of median sternotomy closure in dogs using polydioxanone and wire sutures / J.A. Gines, E.J. Friend, M.A. Vives et al. // J. Small. Anim. Pract. 2011. — Vol. 52, № 11. — P. 582−586.
- Mechanical properties of the triceps surae tendon and aponeurosis in relation to intensity of sport activity / A. Arampatzis, K. Karamanidis, G. Morey-Klapsing et al. // J. Biomech. 2007. — Vol. 40, № 9. — P. 1946−1952.
- Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions / M. van’t Riet, E.W. Steyerberg, J. Nellensteyn et al. // Br. J. Surg. 2002. -Vol. 89, № 11. — P. 1350−1356.
- Microbiology of surgical site infections complicating breast surgery / A.D. Throckmorton, L.M. Baddour, T.L. Hoskin et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). -2010.-Vol. 11, № 4.-P. 355−359.
- Ming X., Nichols M., Rothenburger S. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan) // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2007. — Vol. 8, № 2. — P. 209−214.
- Ming X., Rothenburger S., Nichols M.M. In vivo and in vitro antibacterial efficacy of PDS plus (polidioxanone with triclosan) suture // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2008. — Vol. 9, № 4. — P. 451−457.
- Mitanchez D., Champion V., Walter-Nicolet E. Abdominal wall defects // Arch. Pediatr. 2010. — Vol. 17, № 6. — P. 818−819.
- Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture / R.S. Bezwada, D.D. Jamiolkowski, I.Y. Lee et al. // Biomaterials. 1995. -Vol. 16, № 15. — P. 1141−1148.
- Napolitano L.M. Perspectives in surgical infections: what does the future hold?//Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2010. — Vol. 11, № 2.-P. 111−123.
- National nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003 // Am. J. Infect. Control. 2003. — Vol. 31. — P. 481−498.
- New anti-infective coatings of surgical sutures based on a combination of antiseptics and fatty acids / F.D. Matl, J. Zlotnyk, A. Obermeier et al. // J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2009. — Vol. 20, № 10. — P. 1439−1449.
- Nilsson T. Mechanical properties of Prolene and Ethilon sutures after three weeks in vivo // Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1982. — Vol. 16, № 1. -P. 11−15.
- Outcome of a strategy to reduce surgical site infection in a tertiary-care hospital / K.-H. Liau, K.-T. Aung, N. Chua et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). -2010.-Vol. 11, № 2.-P. 151−159.
- Outcome of components separation for contaminated complex abdominal wall defects / S. Yegiyants, M. Tam, D.J. Lee, M.A. Abbas // Hernia. 2012. — Vol. 16, № 1. -P. 41−45.
- Owens C.D., Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention // J. Hosp. Infect. 2008. — Vol. 70, suppl 2. -P. 3−10.
- Pancreaticojejunostomy using a fibrin adhesive sealant (TachoComb) for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy / K. Mita, H. Ito, M. Fukumoto et al. // Hepatogastroenterology. 2011. — Vol. 58, № 105. -P. 187−191.
- Pavan A., Bosio M., Longo T. A comparative study of poly (glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1979. — Vol. 13, № 3. — P. 477−496.
- Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection: summary of NICE guidance // BMJ. 2008. — Vol. 337. — P. al924.
- Prevention of abdominal wound infection (PROUD trial, DRKS00000390): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial / U. Heger, S. Voss, P. Knebel et al. // Trials. 2011. — Vol. 12. — P. 245.
- Prolonged antibacterial action of polymer coated suture materials / K.R. Aleksandrov, A.V. Volenko, T.A. Vasina, I.V. Sidorova // Antibiot Khimioter. -1991. Vol. 36, № 11. — P. 37−40.
- Randomized trial of antimicrobial-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infection after breast cancer surgery / N. Williams, H. Sweetland, S. Goyal et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2011. — Vol. 12, № 6. — P. 469174.
- Rath A.M., Chevrel J. R The healing of laparotomies: a review of the literature. Part 1. Physiologic and pathologic aspects // Hernia. 1998. — № 2. -P. 145−149.
- Reinforced tension line versus simple suture: a biomechanical study on cadavers / L. Venclauskas, I. Grubinskas, P. Mocevicius, M. Kiudelis // Acta. Chir. Belg. 2011. — Vol. Ill, № 5. — P. 288−292.
- Review of the evidence on the closure of abdominal wall defects / V.E. Mortellaro, S.D. St Peter, RB. Fike, S. Islam // Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2011. — Vol. 27, № 4. — P. 391−397.
- Richards P.C., Balch C.M., Aldrete J.S. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques // Ann. Surg. 1983. — Vol. 197, № 2. — P. 238−243.
- Risk factors of surgical site infection after hepatectomy for liver cancers / S. Kobayashi, N. Gotohda, T. Nakagohn et al. // World J. Surg. 2009. — Vol. 33, № 2. — P. 312−317.
- Role of modern absorbable suture materials in decreasing the occurrence of early complications after laparotomy / T. Bohanes, C. Neoral, J. Klein et al. // Rozhl. Chir. 2002. — Vol. 81, suppl. 1. — P. S24-S26.
- Rosenberger L.H., Politano A.D., Sawyer R.G. The surgical care improvement project and prevention of post-operative infection, including surgical site infection // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2011. — Vol. 12, № 3. — P. 163−168.
- Rozelle C. J, Leonardo J., Li V. Antimicrobal suture wound closure for cerebral fluid shunt surgery: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial // J. Neurosurg. Pediaatncs. 2008. — № 2. — P. 111−117.
- Safety of performing a delayed anastomosis during damage control laparotomy in patients with destructive colon injuries / C.A. Ordocez, L.F. Pino, M. Badiel et al. // J. Trauma. 2011. — Vol. 71, № 6. — P. 1512−1517- 15 171 518.
- Sakman. G., Kaya F. Comparison of different operation techniques and suture materials in pyloric exclusion, in an animal model // Surgery Today. -2008. № 38. — P. 826−832.
- Sankaran P. S., Deshpande P.J. Susruta. In V. Raghvan // Scientists. -1990. P. 44−72.
- Schug-Pass C., Lippert H., Kijckerling F. Primary mesh augmentation with fibrin glue for abdominal wall closure-investigations on a biomechanical model // Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010. — Vol. 395, № 2. — P. 151−156.
- Shcherba S.N., Polovinkin V.V. Use of Tachocomb for prevention of postoperative lymphatic leaks in the abdomen // Vopr. Onkol. 2011. — Vol. 57, № 2. — P. 269−270.
- Shearer D.C., Blunt E. The latest choice in wound closure. When and how to use Dermabond // Adv. Nurse. Pract. 2000. — Vol. 8, № 5. — P. 85−87, 101.
- Short-term exposure to triclosan decreases thyroxine in vivo via upregulation of hepatic catabolism in Young Long-Evans rats / K.B. Paul, J.M. Hedge, M.J. DeVito, K.M. Crofton // Toxicol. Sci. 2010. — Vol. 113, № 2. — P. 367−379.
- Silk-based biomaterials / G.H. Altman, F. Diaz, C. Jakuba et al. // Biomaterials. 2003. — Vol. 24, № 3. — P. 401−416.
- Single-institutional experience with the surgical infection prevention project in intra-abdominal surgery / T.L. Hedrick, F.E. Turrentine, R.L. Smith et al. // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2007. — Vol. 8, № 4. — P. 425−435.
- Skin Closure of Pfannenstiel Incision with Dermabond, Staples, or Suture during Cesarean Delivery: Experience of a Single Attending/ D.S. Siddiqui, E.M. Lacuna, H.Y. Chen, S.P. Chauhan // Am J Perinatol. 2012.
- Smart P., Mann G.B. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions // Br. J. Surg. 2002. — Vol. 89. — P. 1350−1356.
- Stadler S., Fleck T. Triclosan-coated sutures for the reduction of sternal wound infections? A retrospective observational analysis // Interact Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011. — Vol. 13, № 3. — P. 296−299.
- Storch M.L., Rothenburger S.J., Jacinto G. Experimental efficacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with
- Staphylococcus aureus // Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2004. — Vol. 5, № 3. — P. 281−288.
- Stress relaxation and creep: viscoelastic properties of common suture materials used for flexor tendon repair / F. Vizesi, C. Jones, N. Lotz et al. // J. Hand. Surg. Am. 2008. — Vol. 33, № 2. — P. 241−246.
- Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery / F. Marco, R. Vallez, P. Gonzalez et al. // Surg, infect. (Larchmt). 2007. — Vol. 8, № 3. — P. 359−365.
- Surgical site infection a European perspective of incidence and economic burden / D.J. Leaper, H. van Goor, J. Reilly et al. // Int. Wound J. — 2004. — Vol. 1, № 4. — P. 247−273.
- Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon / M. Htbner, M. Diana, G. Zanetti et al. // Arch. Surg. 2011. — Vol. 146, № 11. — P. 1240−1245.
- Suzuki S. An experimental study on absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials in aortic anastomoses: influence of the growth to suture lines and anastomotic sites // Hokkaido Igaku. Zasshi. 1993. — Vol. 68, № 5. — P. 767−779.
- Tanner J., Swarbrook S., Stuart J. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008. — № 1. — P. CD004288.
- Temporary abdominal closure and early and late pathophysiological consequences of treating an open abdomen / O. Jannasch, J. Tautenhahn, H. Lippert, F. Meyer // Zentralbl. Chir. 2011. — Vol. 136, № 6. — P. 575−584.
- The biocompatibility of suture materials used in colon surgery. An experimental study in the rat / R. Cursio, J. Gugenheim, J. Mouiel et al. // Minerva Chir. 1999. — Vol. 54, № 1−2. — P. 49−55.
- The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model / C.F. Bellows, B.M. Wheatley, K. Moroz et al. // PLoS One. -2011. Vol. 6, № 6. — P. e21228.
- The effect of growth differentiation factor-5-coated sutures on tendon repair in a rat model / J.S. Dines, L. Weber, P. Razzano et al. // J. Shoulder. Elbow. Surg. 2007. — Vol. 16, № 5. — P. S215-S221.
- The effect of six knotting methods on the biomechanical properties of three large diameter absorbable suture materials / P.-Y. Mulon, F. Zhim, L.H. Yahia, A. Desrochers // Vet. Surg. 2010. — Vol. 39, № 5. — P. 561−565.
- The effect of triclosan-coated sutures in wound healing. A double blind randomised prospective pilot study / A.E. Deliaert, E. Van den Kerckhove, S. Tuinder et al. // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2009. — Vol. 62, № 6. — P. 771−773.
- The effect of two nonresorbable suture types on the mechanical performance over a metal suture anchor eyelet / D. Acton, A. Perry, R. Evans et al. // Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004. — Vol. 12, № 2. — P. 165−168.
- The impact of different closure materials on pharyngeal wound healing: an experimental animal study / S.-A. Liu, K.-C. Tung, C.-C. Cheng, Y.-T. Chiu // Eur. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008. — Vol. 265, № 2. — P. 227−231.
- The role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in preventing postoperative infection: a meta-analysis / R.-C. Yan, S.-Q. Shen, Z.B. Chen et al. // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech A. 2011. — Vol. 21, № 4. — P. 301−306.
- Thiede A., Dietz U., Debus S. Clinical application-suture materials // Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002. — Vol. 119. — P. 276−282.
- Triclosan: a critical review of the experimental data and development of margins of safety for consumer products / J.V. Rodricks, J.A. Swenberg, J.F. Borzelleca et al. // Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2010. — Vol. 40, № 5. — P. 422−484.
- Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after hepatobiliary surgery-a prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study / C. Justinger, J. Schuld, J. Sperling et al. // Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011. -Vol. 396, № 6. — P. 845−850.
- Vagina, abdominal skin, and aponeurosis: do they have similar biomechanical properties? / B. Gabriel, C. Rubod, M. Brieu et al. // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2011. — Vol. 22, № 1. — P. 23−27.
- Vainionaa S., Rorranen P., Tormala P. Surgical applications of biodegradable polymers in human tissues // Prog. Polym. Sci. 1989. — Vol. 14. — P. 679−716.
- Wadstrom J., Gerdin B. Closure of the abdominal wall: how and why? // Acta. Chir. Scand. 1990. — № 156. — P. 75−82.
- Wasiljew B.K., Winchester D.P. Experience with continuous absorbable suture in the closure of abdominal incisions // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982. -Vol. 154. — P. 378−380.
- Wei land D.E., Bay R.C., Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis // Am. J. Surg. 1998. — Vol. 176, № 6. — P. 666−670.
- Wilson J., Burman-Roy S., Leaper D. Preventing and managing surgical site infections // Br. J. Hosp. Med. (Lond). 2009. — Vol. 70, № 4. — P. 184−185.
- Wound closure sutures and needles: a new perspective // J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2010. — Vol. 29, № 4. — P. 339−361.