Полушарная организация процессов внимания в модифицированной модели Струпа: роль фактора пола
Диссертация
Перед экспериментом шла тренировочная фаза, в течение которой предъявлялись цветные крестики. Во время этой фазы испытуемые обучались нажимать на определенные клавиши, не отрывая взгляда от центральной точки фиксации на мониторе. Эксперимент состоял из двух серий: неразнесенной и разнесенной. В первой серии цвет и слово не разделяли, испытуемым предъявляли слово, обозначающее название цвета… Читать ещё >
Содержание
- ГЛАВА 1. ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
- 1. 1. Внимание как объект исследования психофизиологии
- 1. 2. Модификации задачи Струпа
- 1. 2. 1. Классическая задача Струпа
- 1. 2. 2. Введение конгруэнтных стимулов в ЗС
- 1. 2. 3. Серийное и случайное предъявление стимулов в ЗС
- 1. 2. 4. Латерализованное предъявление стимулов в ЗС
- 1. 2. 5. Пространственно разделенные стимулы в ЗС
- 1. 2. Тектоническая теория обработки стимулов ЗС
- 1. 3. Структурно-функциональные основы эффекта интерференции в ЗС
- 1. 3. 1. Структурно-функциональные основы эффекта интерференции в ЗС, обнаруженные с использованием томографических методов
- 1. 3. 2. Исследования электрической активности мозга при решении задачи Струпа
- 1. 3. 2. 1. Исследование ЗС методом вызванных потенциалов
- 1. 3. 2. 2. ЭЭГ осцилляты при решении ЗС
- 1. 3. 2. 3. Вызванная синхронизация/вызванная десинхронизация при решении ЗС
- 1. 4. Особенности селекции информации и эффекта
- 2. 1. Испытуемые
- 2. 2. Стимулы
- 2. 3. Процедура предъявления стимулов
- 2. 3. 1. Серийное предъявление
- 2. 3. 2. Случайное предъявление
- 2. 4. Исследование ЭЭГ
- 2. 4. 1. Эксперимент по изучению полушарного взаимодействия при выполнении ЗС
- 2. 4. 2. Эксперимент по изучению вызванной синхронизации и десинхронизации при выполнении ЗС
- 2. 5. Предварительная подготовка и анализ ЭЭГ данных
- 2. 5. 1. Эксперимент по изучению полушарного взаимодействия при выполнении ЗС
- 2. 5. 2. Анализ вызванной синхронизации и десинхронизации. (ВС/ВД)
- 2. 6. Статистическая обработка данных
- 3. 1. Половые различия ЭЭГ-когерентности при решении модернизированной задачи Струпа
- 3. 1. 1. Поведенческие данные
- 3. 1. 2. Данные ЭЭГ исследования
- 3. 2. Поведенческие данные полушарной асимметрии при серийном и случайном способах предъявления стимулов в задаче Струпа
- 3. 3. Анализ вызванной синхронизации/десинхронизации при выполнении латерализованной пространственной задачи Струпа
Список литературы
- Aine С. J., Harter M.R. Hemispheric differences in event-related potentials to stroop stimuli. Attention and color-word processing // Ann N Y Acad Sci. -1984.-Vol. 425.-P. 154−156.
- Aine C.J., Harter M.R. Event-related potentials to stroop stimuli. Color and word processing // Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984. — Vol. 425. — P. 152−153.
- Alivisatos В., Wilding J. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli // Cortex. 1982. — Vol. 1. — P. 5−21.
- Arruda J.E., Walker K.A., Weiler M.D., Valentino D.A. Validation of a right hemisphere vigilance system as measured by principal component and factor analyzed quantitative electroencephalogram // Int J Psychophysiol. 1999. -Vol. 2.-P. 119−128.
- Atkinson C.M., Drysdale K.A., Fulham W.R., Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli // International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2003. — Vol. 47. — P. 1 -21.
- Banich M., Milham M., Cohen N.J., Wszalek Т., Kramer A., Liang Z.P., Gullet D., Shah C., Brown C. Prefrontal regions play a predominant role inimposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMRI I I Cogn. Brain Res. -2000a. Vol. 10. — P. 1−9.
- Ba§ ar E., Ba§ ar-Eroglu C., Karaka§ S., Schiirmann M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes // Int J Psychophysiol. -2001.-Vol. 2−3.-P. 241−248.
- Becker T.M., Kerns J.G., Macdonald A.W. 3rd, Carter C.S. Prefrontal Dysfunction in First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients. during a Stroop Task // Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008. — Ian 23. Epub ahead of print.
- Bench C.I., Frith C.D., Grasby P.M., Friston K.I., Paulesu E., Frackowiak R.S.I., Dolan RJ., Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test//Neuropsychologia: 1993. — Vol. 31. — P. 907- 922.
- Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen I.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control // Psychological Review. 2001. — Vol. 108.-P. 624−652.
- Boy den J. G., Gilpin A. R. Matching familiar figures test and Stroop test performance in adults // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1978. — Vol. 46. — P. 854.
- Bockova M., Chladek I., lurak P., Halamek I., Rektor I. Executive functions processed in the frontal and lateral temporal cortices: Intracerebral study // Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. — Vol. 118. — P. 2625−2636.
- Brown Т.Е., Gore C.L., Pearson Т. Visual. half-field Stroop effects with spatiarseparationofwords and color targets//Brain Lang. 1998. — Vol- 1. -P. 122−142.
- Brown T.L., Gore G.L., Carr Т.Н. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition «automatic»? // Exp Psychol Gen. -2002. Vol 2. — P. 220−240.
- Brown T.L., Joneleit K., Robinson G.S., Brown C.R. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of inventory word processing // Am J Psychol. 2002. — Vol. 4. — P. 515−543.
- Bryden M.P. Laterality: functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press, 1982
- Bunge S.A., Ochsner K. N, Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D. Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and5 out of: mind // Brain. 2001. — Vol. 10. — P. 2074−2086.
- Bunge S.A., Dudukovic N. M, Thomason M.E., Vaidya C. J, Gabrieli J.D. Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: evidence from fMRl // Neuron. 2002. — Vol. 2. — P. 301−311.
- Bush G, Whalen P: J., Rosen B.R., Jenike M.A., Mclnerney S.C., Rauch S.L. The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-validation study with functional MRI // Human Brain Mapping. 1998. — Vol. 6. — P. 270−282.
- Carter C.S., Mintun M., Cohen J.D. Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H20−150 PET study of Stroop task performance // Neuroimage. 1995. — Vol. 2. P. 264−272.
- Carter C.S., van Veen V. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data // Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007. — Vol. 7. -P. 367−379.
- Chavanon M., Wacker J., Stemmler A.L.G. Evidence for a dopaminergic link between working memory and agentic extraversion: An analysis of load-related changes in EEG alpha 1 activity // Biological Psychology. -2007. Vol. 74. — P. 46−59.
- Coull J.T., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S., Grasby P.M. A fronto-parietal network for rapid visual information processing: a PET study of sustained attention and working memory // Neuropsychologia. 1996. — Vol. 11. — P. 1085−1095.
- Coull J.T., Frackowiak R.S., Frith C.D. Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task // Neuropsychologia. 1998. — Vol. 36. — P. 1325−1334.
- Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI // J. Neurosci. 1998. — Vol. 18. — P. 7426−7435.
- Courtney S.M., Ungerleider L.G., Keil K., Haxby J.V. Object and spatial working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex // Cereb Cortex. 1996. -Vol. 6. — P. 39−49.
- Cowell P., Hugdahl K. Individual differences in neurobehavioral measures of laterality and interhemispheric function as measured by dichotic listening // Dev Neuropsychol. 2000. — Vol. 1. — P. 95−112.
- Dalrymple-Alford E.C., Budayer B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test // Percept Mot Skills. 1966. — Vol. 3. P. 12 111 214.
- Dalrymple-Alford E.C. Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task // Perception and Psychophysics. Vol. 11. P. 274 276.
- Davidson R.J., Jackson D.C., Larson C.L., Human electroencephalography. In: Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, L.G., Bernston, G.G. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2000. — P. 27— 51.
- Davis W., Jorgenson C.B., Kritselis A., Opella J. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: The effect of enhancement of spatial skills //International Journal ofNeuroscience. 1981. — Vol. 15. — P. 179−183.
- Davis W., Jorgenson C., Opella J. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: An altered format // International Journal of Neuroscience. 1983.-Vol. 19.-P. 227−230.
- Dehaene S., Kerszberg M., Changeux J. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks // Neurobiology. 1998. — Vol. 95. — P. 14 529−14 534.
- Derbyshire S.W., Vogt B.A., Jones A.K. Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex // Exp Brain Res. 1998. — Vol. 118. — P. 52−60.
- Doppelmayr M., Klimesch W., Sauseng P., Hodlmoser K., Stadler W., Hanslmayr S. Intelligence related differences in EEG-bandpower // Neuroscience Letters. 2005. — Vol. 381. — P. 309−313.
- Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands // Trends Neurosci. 2000. — Vol. 23. — P. 475 483. Review.
- Duncan J. An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex // Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001. — Vol.'2. — P. 820−829:
- Duncan-Johnson C.C., Kopell B.S. The locus of interference in a Stroop task: When you read «blue» do you see «red»? // Psychophysiology. 1980. -Vol. 17.-P. 308−309.
- Duncan-Johnson C.C., Kopell B.S. The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science. 1981. — Vol. 214. — P.: 938−940.
- Dyer E.N., Severance L.J. Stroop interference with successive presentations of separate incongruent words and colors // Journal of Experimental-Psychology. 1973. — Vol. 98. — P. 438−439.
- Dyer E.N. Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color // Journal of Experimental Psychology. -1973a. Vol. 99. — P. 314−317.
- Dyer E.N. Same and different judgments for word-color pairs with «irrelevant» words or colors: Evidence for word-code comparisons // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1973b. — Vol. 98. — P. 102−108.
- Egner Т., Delano M., Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain // Neurolmage. 2007. — Vol. 35. — P. 940 948.
- Egner Т., Hirsch J. The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task // Neuroimage. 2005. — Vol.24. — P. 539 547.
- Fan, J., et al. Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict // Neurolmage. -2003.-Vol. 18.-P. 42−57.
- Hugdahl K., Franzon M. Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color words: effects of gender and handedness // Cortex. 1986. — Vol. 22. — P. 433−445.
- Frith C.D., Friston K., Liddle P.F., Frackowaik R.S.J. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET // Proc R Soc B. 1991. — Vol. 244. — P. 241−246.
- Garavan H., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study // Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.- 1999. Vol. 14. — P.' 8301−8306.
- Gevins A., Smith M.E., McEvoy L., Yu D. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice // Cereb Cortex. 1997. — Vol. 7. — P. 374−385
- Gevins A., Smith M. Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style // Cereb Cortex. 2000. — Vol. 10. — P. 829−839
- Gevins A., Smith M.E., Leong H., McEvoy L., Whitfield-S., Du R., Rush G. Monitoring working memory load' during computer-based tasks with EEG pattern recognition methods // Hum Factors. 1998. — Vol. 40. — P. 79−91
- Goldberg E., Harner R., Lowell M., Podell K., Riggio S. Cognitive bias, functional cortical geometry, and the frontal lobes: Leterallity, sex, and hadedness // J. of Cognit. Neuroscience. 1994. — Vol. 6. — P. 276−296.
- Golden, C. J. Sex differences in performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test// Perceptual and Motor-Skills. 1974. — Vol. 39. — P. 1067−1070.
- Goldman-Rakis P. S. Tomography of cognition: Parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex // Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1988. -Vol. 11.-P. 137−156.
- Gomarus H.K., Althaus M., Wijers A.A., Minderaa R.B. The effects of memory load and stimulus relevance on the EEG during a visual selective memory search task: an ERP and ERD/ERS study // Clin Neurophysiol. -2006.-Vol. 117. P. 871−884.
- Grabner R.H., Brunner C., Leeb R., Neuper C., Pfurtscheller G. Event-related EEG theta and alpha band oscillatory responses during language translation // Brain Research Bulletin. 2007. — Vol. 72. — P. 57−65.
- Guiard, Y. Effect of processing mode on the degree of motor asymmetry in the manual Stroop test // Cortex. 1981. — Vol. 17. — P. 427−433.
- Halpern D.F. Sex difference in cognitive abilites // The American Journal of Psychology. 1988. — Vol. 101. — P. 451−454.
- Hampshire A., Duncan J., Owen A.M. Selective tuning of the blood oxygenation level-dependent response during simple target detection dissociates human frontoparietal subregions // J Neurosci. 2007. — Vol. 27. -P. 6219−6223.
- Harrison B.J., Shaw M., Yucel M., Purcell R., Brewer W.J., Strother S.C., Egan G.F., Olver J.S., Nathan P.J., Pantelis C. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance // Neuroimage. 2005. — Vol. 1. — P. 181 191.
- Hartley A.A. Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age // Psychol Aging. 1993. — Vol. 8. — P. 371−379.
- Head A.S., Pedoe D.S.T. A choice-reaction time task utilizing congruent and incongruent colouryword stimuli: another reaction to Stroop // Percept. Mot. Skills. 1990.-Vol. 71.-P. 115−119.
- Heller W. Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in emotion, personality, and arousal // Neuropsychology. -1993. Vol. 7. — P. 476−489.
- Hetrick W.P., Sandman C.A., Bunney W.E.Jr., et al. Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potentials in normal subjects // Biol. Psychiatry.-1996.-Vol. 39.-N1.-P. 51−58.
- Hugdahl K., Franzon M, Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color words: effects of gender and handedness. Cortex. 1986. Sep 22(3). 433−445.
- Hugdahl K., Franzon M. Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color-words reveal mirror-reversal of language lateralization in dextral and sinistral subjects // Cortex. 1985a. — Vol. 3. — P. 359−374.
- Hugdahl K., Franzon M. The incongruent color-words paradigm and language lateralization: an EEG-study // Scand J Psychol. 1985b. — Vol. 4. -P. 321−326.
- Hugdahl K., Franzon M. Effects of speed vs. accuracy in vocal reaction time to visual half-field presentations of incongruent (Stroop) color-words // Cortex. 1987. — Vol. 4. — P. 615−629.
- Ilan A.B., Polich J. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task // Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999. — Vol. 110. — P. 367- 373.
- Jonides J., Smith E.E., Koeppe R.A., Awh E., Minoshima S., Mintun M. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET // Nature. 1993. -Vol. 363.-P. 623−625.
- Johnston A., Venables E. H. Specificity of attention in the Stroop test: An EP study // Biological Psychology. 1982. — Vol. 15. — P. 75−83.
- Jorgenson C., Davis J., Opella J., Angerstein G. Hemispheric- asymmetry in the processing of Stroop-stimuli: An examination of gender, handpreference, and language differences // International Journal of Neuroscience. 1980. — Vol. 11. — P. 165−169.
- Jorgenson С. В., Davis J., Opella J., Angerstein G. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: An examination of age and gender differences // International Journal of Neuroscience. 1981. — Vol. 13. — P. 113−116.
- Jorgenson С. В., Davis W E, Wilbon P., Opella J. L. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: A balanced design // International Journal ofNeuroscience. 1983. — Vol. 21. — P. 171−174.
- Kalkofen H. Critical investigations of the interference phenomenon (STROOP) // Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig. 1969.
- Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening // Cortex.-1967.-Vol.3.-P. 163−178.
- Kimura D. Sex differences in intrahemispheric organization of speech // Behav. Brain Sci.-1980.-N3.-P.240−241.
- Kimura D. Sex differences in cerebral organization for speech and praxis functions // Can. J. Psychol. 1983. — Vol. 37. — P. 19−35.
- Kinomura S., J. Larsson et al. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei // Science. 1996. — Vol. 271. -P. 512−515.
- Kinsbourne M. Lateral interations in the brain. In: Kinsbourne M. Smith W.l. (Eds.) Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, IL: C.C.Thomas. 1974. — P.239−259.
- Kirchhoff B.A., Wagner A.D., Maril A., Stern C.E. Prefrontaltemporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory // I. Neurosci- 2000.-Vol. 20. -P. 6173−6180.
- Klimesch W., Doppelmayr M., Russegger H., Pachinger Т., Schwaiger I. Induced alpha band power changes in the human- EEG and attention // Neurosci Lett. 1998. — Vol. 244. — P. 73−76
- Klimesch W., Doppelmayr M., Pachinger Th., Ripper B. Brain oscillations and human memory: EEG correlates in the upper alpha and theta band // Neurosci. Lett. 1997. — Vol. 238. — P. 9−12.
- Klimesch W., Doppelmayr M., Russenger H., et.al. Induced alpha band power changes in the human EEG and attention // Neurosci. Lett.-1998.-Vol.l3.-N244.-P.273−276.
- Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis // Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999. -Vol. 29.-P. 169−195-
- Klimesch W., Pfurtscheller G., Mohl W., Schimke H. Event-related-desynchronization, ERD-mapping and hemispheric differences for word and number //Int. I. Psychophusiol.-1991.-Vol.8.-N3.-P.297−308.
- Koch C., Brown I.B. Examining the time course of prime effects on Stroop processing // Percept. Mot. Skills. 1994. — Vol: 79. — P. 675−687.
- Leocani L., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Ikoma K., Hallett M. Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms // Brain. 2000. — Vol. 123. — P. 1161−1173.
- Leocani L., Того С., Zhuang P., Gerloff C., Hallet M. Event-related' desynchronization in reaction time paradigms: a comparison with event-related potentials and corticospinal excitability // Clin Neurophysiol. 2001. -Vol. 112.-P. 923−930.
- Lewis R.S., Christiansen L. Intrahemispheric sex differences in the functional representation of language and praxic functions in normal individuals // Brain Cogn. 1989. — Vol. 9. P. 238−243.
- Lewis R.S., Christiansen L. Intrahemispheric sex difference in the functional representation of language and praxis functions in normal individuals // Brain Cogn. 1998. — Vol. 9. — P. 238−243.
- Ligon E. M. A genetic study of color naming and word reading // American Journal of Psychology. 1932. — Vol. 44. — P. 103−122.
- Liotti M., Marty G., Woldorff, Ricardo Perez III, Helen S., Maybergl. An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect // Neuropsychologia. 2000. — Vol. 38. — P. 701−711
- Logan G. D., Zbrodoff N. J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task // Memory and Cognition. 1979. — Vol. 7. — P. 166−174.
- Long G. M., Lyman B. J. Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli // British Journal of Psychology. 1987. — Vol. 78. — P. 151 162.
- Louise M.F., Doyle, Yarrow K., Brown P. Lateralization of event-related beta desynchronization in the EEG during pre-cued reaction time tasks // Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005. — Vol. 116. — P. 1879−1888.
- Lowe D. G., Mitterer J. O. Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task// Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1982. — Vol. 36. — P. 684−700.i
- Lupien S., Laerance M., Lecours A. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli //Brain & Cognition.- 1993.-Vol. 21.-P.153−162.
- MacDonald III, A.W., et al. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control // Science. -2000. -Vol. 288. P. 1835- 1838.
- MacLeod С. M. Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review // Psychological Bulletin. 1991. — Vol. 109. — P. 163 203.
- MacLeod C.M. The Stroop task in cognitive research // National science. Review. -2005.
- MacLeod C.M., MacDonald P.A. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention // Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000. — Vol. 4. — P. 383- 391.
- Markela-Lerenca J., Illeb N., Kaisera S., Fiedlera P., Mundta C., Weisbrod M. Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? // Cognitive Brain Research. 2004. — Vol. 18. — P. 278−287.
- Matthias M., Marshall L., Fehm H.L., Born J. EEG theta synchronization conjoined with alpha desynchronization indicate intentional encoding // Eur J Neurosci. 2002. — Vol. 15. — P. 923−928.
- McEvoy LK, Pellouchoud E, Smith ME, Gevins A. Neurophysiological signals of working memory in normal aging // Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. -2001. -Vol.3. P. 363−376.
- McGivern R.F., Huston J.P., Byrd D., King Т., Siegle G.J., Reilly J. Sex differences in visual recognition memory: support for a sex-related difference in attention in adults and children // Brain Cogn. 1997, — Vol. 34.- P. 323−336.
- Mekarski J.E., Cutmore T.R., Suboski W. Gender differences during processing of the Stroop task // Percept Mot Skills. 1996. — Vol. 83. — P. 563−568.
- Melara R. D., Algom D. Driven by Information: A Tectonic Theory of Stroop Effects // Psychological Review. 2003. — Vol. 110. — P. 422−471.
- Menon V., Adleman N. E. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task//Hum Brain Mapp. 2001. — Vol. 3. — P. 131−143.
- Meyers-Levy, J. Gender Differences in Information Processing: A Selectivity Interpretation, in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, Cafferata, P., & Tybout, A. M (eds), Lexington Books, Canada.- 1989.
- Milham, M.P., et al. The relative involvement of anterior cingulated andprefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cogn. Brain Res. 2001. — Vol. 12. — P. 467- 473.
- Milham, M.P., et al. Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex’s involvement in top-down control: an event-related fMRJ study of the Stroop task // Cogn. Brain Res. 2003. — Vol. 17. — P. 212- 222.
- Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function // Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001. — Vol. 24. — P. 167- 202.
- Miniussi С., Cappa S.F., Sandrini M., Rossini P.M., Rossi S. The causal role of the prefrontal cortex in episodic memory as demonstrated with rTMS // Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003. — Vol. 56. — P. 312−320.
- Monahan J.S. Coloring- single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing // J Gen Psychol. 2001. — Vol.1. — P. 98−112.
- Molle M., Marshall L., Fehm H.L., Born J. EEG theta synchronization conjoined with alpha desynchronization indicate intentional encoding // Eur J Neurosci. 2002. — Vol. 15. — P. 923−928.
- Naish, P.L.N. The locus of the Stroop effect: one site masquerading as two? //Br. J. Psychol. 1985. — Vol. 76. — P. 303−310.
- Newman J.P. Induced anxiety and stroop Color-Word Test performance: hemispheric processing implications // Int J Neurosci. 1981. — Vol. 12. -P. 63−66.
- Norman D. A, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior // (report no. 8006). La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego. 1980.
- Normann D. A, Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. // Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory. -1986. Vol'. 4. — P. 1−18.
- Ojermann G.A. Brain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping // Behav. Brain Sci. 1983. — Vol. 6. — P. 189 230.
- Pardo I.V., Pardo P.J., Janer K.W., Raichle M.E. The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1990.- Vol. 87. Vol. 25. — P. 6−9.
- Owen A.M., Evans A.C., Petrides M. Evidence for a two-stage model of spatial working memory processing within the lateral frontal cortex: a positron emission tomography study // Cereb Cortex. 1996. — Vol. 6. — P. 31−38.
- Paulesu E., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory //Nature. 1993. — Vol. 362. P. 342−344.
- Paus Т., Petrides M., Evans A.C., Meyer E. Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech. responses: a positron emission tomography study // J Neurophysiol. 1993. — Vol. 70. -P. 453−469.
- Perlstein W.M., Larson M.J., Dotson V.M., Kelly K.G. Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued- Stroop task // Neuropsychologia. 2006. — Vol. 44.- P. 260−274.
- Perlstein W.M., Carter C.S., Barch D.M., Baird I. The Stroop task andattentional deficits in schizophrenia: A critical evaluation of card and single-trial Stroop methodologies // Neuropsychology. 1998. — Vol. 12. -p. 414—425.
- Pfurtscheller G. Event-related synchronization ERS: an electrophysiological correlate of cortical areas at rest // Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1992. -Vol. 83.-P. 62−70.
- Pfurtscheller G., da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles // Clin Neurophysiol. 1999. — Vol 110.-P. 1842−1857.
- Pfurtscheller G., Brunner C., Schlogl A., Lopes da Silva F.H. Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks // Neuroimage. 2006. — Vol. 31. P. 153−159.
- Posner M. I. Attentional mechanisms // Encyclopedia of the Neurological Science 2003. — P. 292−299.
- Posner M. I, Sheese BE, Odluda§ Y, Tang Y. Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks //Neural Netw. 2006. — Vol. 19. — P. 1422−1429.
- Posner M. I., Rafal R. D., Choate L., Vaughn J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function // Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1985. — Vol. 2. — P. 211 228.
- Posner M.I., Pavese A. Anatomy of word and sentence meaning // Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.- 1998. Vol. 95. — P. 899−905.
- Posner M.I., Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain // Ann. Rev. of Neurosc. 1990. — Vol. 13. — P. 25−42.
- Posner M.I., Rafal R., Choate L., Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function // Cogn. Neuropsychol. 1985. — Vol. 2. — P. 211−228.
- Ratinckx E., Brysbaert M. Interhemispheric stroop-like interference in number comparison: evidence for strong interhemispheric integration of semantic number information // Neuropsychology. 2002. — Vol. 16. — P. 217−229.
- Ravnkilde В., Videbech P., Rosenberg R., Gjedde A., Gade A. Putative tests of frontal lobe function: a PET-study of brain activation during Stroop’s Testand verbal fluency // J Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2002. — Vol. 24. — P. 534 547.
- Rebai M., Bernard C., Lannou J. The Stroop’s test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400 // Int J Neurosci. 1997. — Vol. 91. — P. 85−94.
- Risberg J., Prohovnik I. Cortical processing of visual and tactile stimuli studied by non-invasive rCBF meashurements // Human Neurobiol. 1983. -Vol. 2. P. 5−10.
- Roelofs A. Intentional control of perception and action-in language use. //Psychological Research, Munich, Germany, 2000. Dec. 8.
- Roelofs A., Lamers M.J. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: evidence from the Stroop task // Percept Psychophys. 2007. — Vol. 69. — P. 1305−1314.
- Roelofs A. The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course // Memory & Cognition 2005. Vol. 33. — P. 1325−1336
- Rosenfeld J.P., Skogsberg K.R. РЗОО-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: The evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis // International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2006. — Vol. 60. -P. 240−250
- Rosenfeld J.P., Rao A., Soskins M., Miller A.R. Scaled P300 Scalp distribution correlates of verbal deception in an autobiographical odd ball task // J. Psychophysiology. 2003. — Vol. 17. P. 14−20.
- Rushworth M.F., Krams M., Passingham R.E. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain // J Cogn Neurosci. 2001. -Vol. 13. — P. 698−710.
- Sarmanay. I. Different performance in Stroop’s Interference Test from the aspect of personality and sex // Studia Psychologica. 1977. — Vol. 19. — P. 60−67. (From Psychological Abstracts, 1978, 59, Abstract No. 2543)
- Schack В., Chen A.C., Mescha S., Witte H. Instantaneous EEG coherence analysis during the Stroop task // Clin Neurophysiol. 1999. — Vol. 8. -P. 1410−1426.
- Schack M.L. Coaching: the art of creating exceptional results // Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1997. — Vol. 1. — P. 28−32.
- Schmit V., Davis R. The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli // Acta Psychologica. 1974. — Vol. 38. — P. 149−158.
- Schneider W., Shiffrin R. M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention // Psychological Review. -1977.-Vol. 84.-P. 1−66.
- Schroeter M.L., Zysset S., Wahl M., von Cramon D.Y. Links Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development an event-related fNIRS study //Neuroimage. 2004. — Vol. 4. — P. 1317−1325.
- Shor R. E. An auditory analog of the Stroop test // Journal of General Psychology. 1975. — Vol. 93. — P. 281−288.
- Sladekova L., Daniel J. Differences in performance in Stroop’s test from the aspect of sex and age // Studia Psychologica. 1981. — Vol. 23. — P. 145−149.
- Smith E.E., Jonides J. Working memory in humans: neuropsychological evidence // In: The cognitive neurosciences (Gazzaniga M, ed.). 1995. — P. 1009−1020.
- Smith E.E., Jonides J., Koeppe R.A. Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET // Cereb. Cortex. 1996. — Vol. 6. P. 11−20.
- Stam C.J. Brain dynamics in theta and alpha frequency bands and working memory performance in humans // Neurosci. Let.- 2000. -Vol.286. P. 115 118.
- Stroop, J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions // J. Exp. Psychol. 1935. — Vol. 18. — P. 643- 662.
- Struthers G., Charlton S., Bakan P. Lateral orientation, eye movements and dichotic listening // Int. J. Neurosci. -1992.-Vol.66.-N3−4.-P.189−195.
- Sturm W., Willmes K. On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness //Neuroimage. 2001. — Vol. 14. — P. 76−84.
- Toma R. J., Tsao Y.C. Interference effects in the picture word Stroop task // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1985. — Vol. 61. — P. 223−228.
- Tsao Y.C., Feustel Т., Soseos C. Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields // Brain and Language. 1979. — Vol. 8. — P. 367−371.
- Van Veen V., Holroydb C.B., Cohenb J.D., Stengerd V.A., Carter C.S. Errors without conflict: Implications for performance monitoring theories of anterior cingulate cortex // Brain and Cognition. 2004. -Vol. 56. — P. 267−276.
- Van Strien J.W. Hagenbeek R.E., Stam C.J., Rombouts S.A.R.B., Barkhof F. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition // Neuroimage. Vol. 26. — 2005. — P. 952−959.
- Van Veen V., Carter C.S. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies // Physiology & Behavior. 2002a. — Vol. 77. — P. 477−482.
- Voyer D., Flight J. Gender differences in laterality on dichotic task: the influence of report strategies // Cortex. -2001. -Vol.37.-P. 345−362.
- Wagner G., Sinsel E., Sobanski Т., Kohler S., Marinou V., Mentzel H., Sauer H., Schlosser R.G.M. Cortical Inefficiency in Patients with Unipolar Depression: An Event-Related fMRI Study with the Stroop Task // PSYCHIATRY. -2006. Vol. 59. — P. 958−965
- Warren L. R., Marsh G. R. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1978. — Vol. 12. — P. 214−216.
- Weekes N. Y., Zaidel E. The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects // Brain Cogn. 1996. — Vol. 31. — P. 3308−3330.
- Weiss S., Rappelsberger P. Long-range EEG synchronization during word encoding correlates with successful memory performance // Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000. — Vol. 9. — P. 299−312.
- West R., Bell M.A. Stroop Color-Word Interference and Electroencephalogram Activation: Evidence for Age-Related Decline of the
- Anterior Attention System // Neuropsychology. 1997. — Vol. 11. — P. 421 427
- West R. The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task // J Cogn Neurosci. 2004. — Vol. 16. — P. 103−113.
- West R. Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks // Neuropsychologia. 2003. — Vol. 41. — P. 1122−1135.
- West R., Bowry R., McConville C., Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and nonresponse conflict. Psychophysiology. 2004. — Vol. 41. — P. 739- 748.
- Zajano, M. J., & Gorman, A. Stroop interference as a function of percentage of congruent items. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1986. — Vol. 63. — P. 10 871 096.
- Zysset S., Schroeter M.L., Neumann J., Yves von Cramon D. Stroop interference, hemodynamic response and aging: An event-related fMRI study // Neurobiol Aging. 2006. — Jun 9- Epub ahead of print.
- Zysset S., Miiller K., Lohmann G., von Cramon D.Y. Color-word matching Stroop task: separating interference and response conflict // Neurolmage. -2001.-Vol. 13.-P. 29−36.
- Zysset S., Schroeter M.L., Neumann J., Von Cramon D.Y. Stroop interference, hemodynamic response and aging: An event-related fMRI study // Neurobiology of Aging. 2007. — Vol. 28. — P. 937−946.
- Вольф H.B. Половые различия функциональной организации процессов полушарной обработки речевой информации // Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во ООО «ЦВВР». 2000.
- Разумникова. Мышление и функциональная асимметрия мозга // Новосибирск: Издательство СО РАМН, 2004. 272 с
- Разумникова О.М., Вольф Н. В. Половые отличия межполушарного взаимодействия при распределенном и направленном внимании // Ж. высш. нервн. деят. 2006. — Т. 56. — № 3. — С. 327−333
- Суворов Н.Ф., Таиров О. П. Психофизиологические механизмы избирательного внимания. JL: Наука, 1985.